<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Um, we weren&#8217;t really serious about the &#8220;blood feud&#8221; thing</title>
	<link>http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296</link>
	<description>The site where White Sox and Cubs fan try to work out their differences. Or not.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: BURMA</title>
		<link>http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296#comment-4247</link>
		<author>BURMA</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 03:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296#comment-4247</guid>
					<description>A) in a play at the plate, there is know way that the catcher is completely still. The way you seem to imply a "language" issue, it seems to be in the definition of the word "Collision".   He is moving towards the throw, towards the runner, titlting in the wind, whatever.  He's not a brick wall, which pretty much means a language issue for me, in  that you define a "collision" as "A “collision” involves two objects meeting at a speed, such as two cars on the highway. When one player is standing still, it is not a 'collision.'" 

But that discounts the fact that the catcher is, in fact, moving.

B) Part two of the problem is your incorrect definition of the word collision:

collision
     n 1: an event in which two or more bodies come together [syn: hit]
     2: the act of colliding with something [syn: crash, smash]
     3: an accident resulting from violent impact of a moving
        object; "three passengers were killed in the collision";
        "the collision of the two ships resulted in a serious oil
        spill"

None of which imply that BOTH objects need to be in motion; merely one.  


Plus there are other sources that give the word a non-physical definition:

Collision \Col*li"sion\, n. [L. collisio, fr. collidere. See
   Collide.]
   1. The act of striking together; a striking together, as of
      two hard bodies; a violent meeting, as of railroad trains;
      a clashing.

   2. A state of opposition; antagonism; interference.

            The collision of contrary false principles. --Bp.
                                                  Warburton.

            Sensitive to the most trifling collisions. --W.
                                                  Irving.

   Syn: Conflict; clashing; encounter; opposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A) in a play at the plate, there is know way that the catcher is completely still. The way you seem to imply a &#8220;language&#8221; issue, it seems to be in the definition of the word &#8220;Collision&#8221;.   He is moving towards the throw, towards the runner, titlting in the wind, whatever.  He&#8217;s not a brick wall, which pretty much means a language issue for me, in  that you define a &#8220;collision&#8221; as &#8220;A &ldquo;collision&rdquo; involves two objects meeting at a speed, such as two cars on the highway. When one player is standing still, it is not a &#8216;collision.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>But that discounts the fact that the catcher is, in fact, moving.</p>
<p>B) Part two of the problem is your incorrect definition of the word collision:</p>
<p>collision</p>
<p>     n 1: an event in which two or more bodies come together [syn: hit]<br />
     2: the act of colliding with something [syn: crash, smash]<br />
     3: an accident resulting from violent impact of a moving<br />
        object; &#8220;three passengers were killed in the collision&#8221;;<br />
        &#8220;the collision of the two ships resulted in a serious oil<br />
        spill&#8221;</p>
<p>None of which imply that <span class="caps">BOTH</span> objects need to be in motion; merely one.</p>
<p>Plus there are other sources that give the word a non-physical definition:</p>
<p>Collision Col*li&#8221;sion, n. [L. collisio, fr. collidere. See</p>
<p>   Collide.]<br />
   1. The act of striking together; a striking together, as of<br />
      two hard bodies; a violent meeting, as of railroad trains;<br />
      a clashing.</p>
<p>   2. A state of opposition; antagonism; interference.</p>
<p>            The collision of contrary false principles.&#8212;Bp.<br />
                                                  Warburton.</p>
<p>            Sensitive to the most trifling collisions.&#8212;W.<br />
                                                  Irving.</p>
<p>   Syn: Conflict; clashing; encounter; opposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the cubs are cursed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Good Breakdown of the AJ/MB collision and fight</title>
		<link>http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296#comment-4253</link>
		<author>the cubs are cursed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Good Breakdown of the AJ/MB collision and fight</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296#comment-4253</guid>
					<description>[...] Found this interesting&#8230; I guess, if you are REALLY into the fight. Like have nothing to do but dwell on the fight because your team sucks so bad. http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Found this interesting&#8230; I guess, if you are <span class="caps">REALLY</span> into the fight. Like have nothing to do but dwell on the fight because your team sucks so bad. <a href="http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296" rel="nofollow">http://www.snobsvsslobs.com/?p=296</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
